sailboatdata beneteau 411

Oceanis 411 Beneteau

The oceanis 411 beneteau is a 40.78ft fractional sloop designed by finot - conq associates and built in fiberglass by beneteau between 2005 and 2015..

The Oceanis 411 Beneteau is a light sailboat which is a high performer. It is reasonably stable / stiff and has a low righting capability if capsized. It is best suited as a fast cruiser. The fuel capacity is average. There is a short water supply range.

Oceanis 411 Beneteau for sale elsewhere on the web:

Main features

Login or register to personnalize this screen.

You will be able to pin external links of your choice.

See how Sailboatlab works in video

We help you build your own hydraulic steering system - Lecomble & Schmitt

Accommodations

Builder data, other photos.

Modal Title

The content of your modal.

Personalize your sailboat data sheet

• Oceanis 30.1
• Oceanis 34.1
• Oceanis 37.1
• Oceanis 40.1
• Oceanis 46.1
• Oceanis 51.1
• Oceanis Yacht 54
• Oceanis Yacht 60
• FIGARO BENETEAU 3
• Heritage sailing yacht
• Flyer 6 SUNdeck
• FLYER 6 SPACEdeck
• Flyer 7 SUNdeck
• Flyer 7 SPACEdeck
• Flyer 8 SUNdeck
• Flyer 8 SPACEdeck
• Flyer 9 SUNdeck
• Flyer 9 SPACEdeck
• Antares 7 Fishing
• Antares 8 Fishing
• ANTARES 11 FLY
• Gran Turismo 32
• Gran Turismo 36
• Gran Turismo 41
• Gran Turismo 45
• Swift Trawler 35
• Swift trawler 41 Sedan
• Swift trawler 41 Fly
• Swift Trawler 48
• Grand Trawler 62
• Heritage motorboats
• Architects and Designers
• Become a BENETEAU boat owner
• Tests and Awards

Oceanis 41.1

• Description
• Main Points
• Specifications

The Oceanis 41.1 is a distillation of performance at sea and on-board intelligence, offering wide scope for personalization.  On a perfectly balanced chined-hull, there is no equivalent in cockpit space on any other boat this size.

Naval designer :  Finot - Conq Architectes

Interior designer :  Nauta Design

Exterior design

With a mast positioned further back, the Oceanis 41.1 has a sail plan that guarantees excellent balance under sail. Equipped with the Performance Pack (German System and set of Elvstrom sails), this cruiser promises comfortable sailing a very good speeds.

Interior design

Access to the Oceanis 41.1’s harmonious interior bathed in light is by a gently sloping companionway.  It offers new features in each of its four accommodation versions. In the two cabin version, the utility room for a dishwasher and storage, as well as a large cockpit locker affording access from inside are examples of details that mark the difference. 

Full beam cruising

Clearing space and simplifying life on board, the Oceanis 41.1 layout broadens your cruising horizons.

Master cabin

With its double door, bed head facing forward and the choice of an ensuite bathroom, the master cabin is unquestionably the most attractive feature of the Oceanis 41.1.

Swim platform

Providing excellent protection under sail, the transom closing the aft of the yacht opens out to provide a huge swim platform. This affords direct access to the sea, while preserving space and comfort in the cockpit.

Whatever the woods chosen to create the general atmosphere, the six large hull portholes fill the interior with an incredible amount of light.

Virtual tour

Characteristics.

Length Overall

Beam overall

Lightship Displacement

Air Draught Max

Draught Min

Draught Max

Fuel Capacity

Water Capacity

Max. engine power

CE Certification

Short draught keel

Deep draught keel

• CE Certification A8/B9/C12
• B&G Electronics Pack

Layout : 2 cabins - 1 bathroom

• Master cabin with large central bed, bed head facing forward, double door for a good view of the bow - large aft cabin.
• Fitted L-shaped galley, large storage space with scullery to portside including hanging locker, lockers and room for a dishwasher.
• Bathroom with toilet and separate shower.
• Gently sloping 45° saloon companionway with long hand rails .
• Large sails peak accessed from the cockpit and scullery, a hanging locker in each cabin.
• Heating and air-conditioning

Layout :3 cabins - 1 bathroom

• Master cabin with large central bed, bed head facing forward, double door for a good view of the bow - two large aft cabins.
• Fitted L-shaped galley.
• Gently sloping 45° saloon companionway with long hand rails.
• Large amount of storage space: below seats, below flooring, bar unit at bottom of companionway, open shelves.
• Heating and air-conditioning.

Layout : 2 cabins - 2 bathrooms

• Master cabin with large double bed off-centre to have the advantage of a bed head facing forward and an ensuite bathroom to starboard.
• Second bathroom with toilet and separate shower at the stern.

HARKEN HARDWARE

Press Reviews

Boatsales.com.au.

"With a new balanced rig and wide-body hull, this is the fastest and most luxurious 40ft Oceanis ever" read more

Five coastal Navigation Spots Across the World

Beneteau services.

With teams for sea trials, financing, customization, events, an after-sales service, and a network of dealers worldwide, BENETEAU delivers the help and expertise every boat owner needs throughout his boating life maintaining an enduring customer relationship.

Other boats from the range

Oceanis 55.1

16.78 m / 55’1’’

4.96 m / 16’3’’

Select your area and your language

• Chinese, Simplified

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• About The Boat
• Boat Review Forum
• SailNet is a forum community dedicated to Sailing enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about sailing, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, repairs, reviews, maintenance, and more!

Beneteau Oceanis 40 center cockpit

• Add to quote

Just a bit worse than the ones with aft cockpit.  

they sail ok; don't they? Light so should do better in light airs than a Najad or Contest or so.  

Probably. That boat has a great interior and I don't know for what kind of cruising you want the boat but if you can live with the interior of a 411 go for it instead. It is one of the best Beneteaus of its era (more than a thousand made). As you can see the boat not only is lighter as has more sail area, beam and ballast, being a more modern, faster boat with a better stability. The CC has not any advantage in what sailing regards except the bigger interior. OCEANIS 411 (BENETEAU) sailboat specifications and details on sailboatdata.com OCEANIS 400 CC (BENETEAU) sailboat specifications and details on sailboatdata.com Beneteau 411 Used Boat Review September 2006 Boat News, Review & Advice - boatpoint.com.au Beneteau Oceanis 400 Center Cockpit | Cruising World Beneteau 411: Blue Water Boat - Articles - boats.com Beneteau 411 Used Boat Review September 2006 Boat News, Review & Advice - boatpoint.com.au It is also a good looking sailboat: Beneteau 411 Limited Edition Gallery - Ref: 1579 - YachtWorld.com Mobile Regards Paulo  

Good boat, great 'bang for the buck' and capable of sailing most anywhere you want to go. Good choice!  

I had a 36CC and it had the same hull as the 361 = both sailed well... I expect the 40CC to do so as well. the only thing I would change is holding tank capacity or add an lectrascan or similar system. The wife and I hope to find one to retire on in the next few years. Grreat boat  

The base PHRF ratings are 126 for the 400CC, 117 for the 400AC, and 108 for the 411 - so not huge performance differences between them going by that. We recently looked at a 400AC and a few 411's. The 400 is about 2,000 lbs heavier than the 411. I assume the hulls are similar and came out of the same mold. The 400 certainly feels heavier as the cabinetry and floorboards seem beefier, the fridge is lined with stainless steel instead of plastic as on the 411, and the fiberglass shower liners are more substantial/bulky. I'm actually surprised the PHRF difference is so small considering the weight difference. We didn't look at any 400CCs but did see a 42CC. One thing I found odd about both is that they don't come standard with dynamically adjustable travelers - that would drive me nuts. The idea that CC boats don't perform well becomes a self fulfilling prophecy when basic performance gear is left off.  

4arch said: The base PHRF ratings are 126 for the 400CC, 117 for the 400AC, and 108 for the 411 - so not huge performance differences between them going by that. ... Click to expand...

• ?            
• 173.8K members

Top Contributors this Month

Great choice! Your favorites are temporarily saved for this session. Sign in to save them permanently, access them on any device, and receive relevant alerts.

• Sailboat Guide

Beneteau Oceanis 411

Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 41 ′ 0 ″ / 12.5 m monohull sailboat designed by Jean Marie Finot (Groupe Finot) and built by Beneteau between 1997 and 2005.

Rig and Sails

Auxilary power, accomodations, calculations.

The theoretical maximum speed that a displacement hull can move efficiently through the water is determined by it's waterline length and displacement. It may be unable to reach this speed if the boat is underpowered or heavily loaded, though it may exceed this speed given enough power. Read more.

Classic hull speed formula:

Hull Speed = 1.34 x √LWL

Max Speed/Length ratio = 8.26 ÷ Displacement/Length ratio .311 Hull Speed = Max Speed/Length ratio x √LWL

Sail Area / Displacement Ratio

A measure of the power of the sails relative to the weight of the boat. The higher the number, the higher the performance, but the harder the boat will be to handle. This ratio is a "non-dimensional" value that facilitates comparisons between boats of different types and sizes. Read more.

SA/D = SA ÷ (D ÷ 64) 2/3

• SA : Sail area in square feet, derived by adding the mainsail area to 100% of the foretriangle area (the lateral area above the deck between the mast and the forestay).
• D : Displacement in pounds.

Ballast / Displacement Ratio

A measure of the stability of a boat's hull that suggests how well a monohull will stand up to its sails. The ballast displacement ratio indicates how much of the weight of a boat is placed for maximum stability against capsizing and is an indicator of stiffness and resistance to capsize.

Ballast / Displacement * 100

Displacement / Length Ratio

A measure of the weight of the boat relative to it's length at the waterline. The higher a boat’s D/L ratio, the more easily it will carry a load and the more comfortable its motion will be. The lower a boat's ratio is, the less power it takes to drive the boat to its nominal hull speed or beyond. Read more.

D/L = (D ÷ 2240) ÷ (0.01 x LWL)³

• D: Displacement of the boat in pounds.
• LWL: Waterline length in feet

Comfort Ratio

This ratio assess how quickly and abruptly a boat’s hull reacts to waves in a significant seaway, these being the elements of a boat’s motion most likely to cause seasickness. Read more.

Comfort ratio = D ÷ (.65 x (.7 LWL + .3 LOA) x Beam 1.33 )

• D: Displacement of the boat in pounds
• LOA: Length overall in feet
• Beam: Width of boat at the widest point in feet

Capsize Screening Formula

This formula attempts to indicate whether a given boat might be too wide and light to readily right itself after being overturned in extreme conditions. Read more.

CSV = Beam ÷ ³√(D / 64)

Similar to BENETEAU 411 (in US), STARDUST 411, MOORINGS 413.

Embed this page on your own website by copying and pasting this code.

Discover Related Sailboats

United States Sailboat Show 2019

The sailboat show in Annapolis runs Oct 10—14, 2019, and features over 130 sailboats, including the premiere of 30 models over 30 feet.

• About Sailboat Guide

©2024 Sea Time Tech, LLC

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Beneteau 411

The Beneteau 411 sailboat is a popular cruising yacht known for its performance, comfort, and ease of handling. This vessel was designed by Jean Berret and Olivier Racoupeau, and it was first introduced in 1997. The Beneteau 411 features a sleek, modern design with a spacious cockpit, a roomy interior, and a large swim platform. The boat has a fin keel and a spade rudder, which provide excellent handling and stability in a wide range of conditions.

The Beneteau 411 sailboat has a length overall of 41 feet and a beam of 13 feet, making it a comfortable and spacious yacht for cruising. The interior layout includes two private staterooms, two heads, and a large salon area. The galley is well-equipped with a stove, oven, refrigerator, and sink. The boat is powered by a 50-horsepower Yanmar diesel engine, and it has a fuel capacity of 39 gallons. The Beneteau 411 has a maximum cruising speed of 7.5 knots and a range of approximately 350 nautical miles. Overall, the Beneteau 411 sailboat is a versatile and reliable yacht that is well-suited for cruising and coastal sailing.

LOA: 41.00 ft LWL: 36.92 ft Beam: 13.00 ft Draft: 4.75 ft Displacement: 17196.00 lbs Ballast: 5500.00 lbs Hull type: Fin w/bulb & spade rudder Hull construction: FG Rigging type: Masthead Sloop

Beneteau 411 for sale in the last 12 months

Below you'll find the latest Beneteau 411 listings for the last 12 months. We compare the listing price with boats listed in the past and the color coding indicates if the price is good (green = below the average listing price) or more on the expensive side (red = seller is asking more than the average listing price).

Beneteau 411 listing prices over time

Listing details.

• Forums New posts Unanswered threads Register Top Posts Email
• What's new New posts New Posts (legacy) Latest activity New media
• Media New media New comments
• Boat Info Downloads Weekly Quiz Topic FAQ 10000boatnames.com
• Classifieds Sell Your Boat Used Gear for Sale
• Parts General Marine Parts Hunter Beneteau Catalina MacGregor Oday
• Help Terms of Use Monday Mail Subscribe Monday Mail Unsubscribe

Beneteau 411

• Thread starter Rives
• Start date Jan 19, 2021
• Beneteau Owner Forums
• Ask A Beneteau Owner

I have recently bought a beneteau 411. I measured the rig with a loose gage and the measurements are so low they do not register. The mast has about 3.5 inches of pre-bend and I feel that is why I'm having issues with the furling main. I'm looking for a starting point. Can anyone tell me what measurements they have with their 411. Thanks Pete  

Tuning the standing rigging

How to Tune a Sailboat Mast - The Rigging Company

Attachments

• Tuning Guide for Masthead Double Spreader Rig.pdf 78.9 KB Views: 212

Thank you  

One starting point with the Loos gauge is to look at the recommendations on the box it came in, if you are fortunate enough to still have it. The box has a table showing rigging diameter and suggested Loos gauge reading.  

In mast furling...... the prebend is already in mast. If you add, the in mast furler will have issues. However sounds like your rig is too loose and should be tightened. Good Luck  

CapitalistSailor

Congratulations on your new boat! If your boat was just launched the yard will generally not put more tension on the shrouds and stays than is needed to keep the mast upright at the dock. If you can find some similar boats in your marina or nearby, give those shrouds a wiggle or measure their tension with a Loos gauge to get an idea what other rigs feel like. Racing boats are generally set up more tightly, and most have a way to adjust backstay tension underway (tighter for upwind and windy days). Once you get the mast straight side-to-side, and is raked the amount you want, setting the tension to twenty per cent of breaking strength is one place to start for 1x19 stainless steel wire. Also, once you get the rig set the way you want at the dock, go sailing and see if the shrouds on the leeward side go slack when the rig is loaded up. More than a very small amount is slack is bad. Also check to see if the mast is bending side to side; sometimes the top will bend off to leeward or the middle will. After the initial tensioning, the boat will bend a little with overnight and the next day and some re-tensioning of the shrouds will be needed after a couple days (the boat is plastic with fiberglass fibers, after all, not metal). Usually the second adjustment will do it. I recommend putting some lubricant on the turnbuckle threads before turning them. I use a small dab of anhydrous lanolin at each thread, but there many lubricants. Also, it is better to use a wrench on the body of the turnbuckle and a second wrench on the pin, rather than a wrench on the pin and a screwdriver through the turnbuckle, although the screwdriver is a common practice. I suggest you write down your initial and final settings so you can come back to them later. I also record the number of turns so I can see later how many turns gave me the last increment of tension. Some people like stainless cotter pins and some like rings to lock the turnbuckles. I use bronze cotter pins. They are much easier to bend and unbend, but they are plenty strong enough to stay in place. When you're done, covering the turnbuckles with rigging tape or a cover will keep sails and ankles from snagging on the cotter pins/rings. If you're new at this it would be worth a couple hours of a professional rigger's time to set it up for you the first time, and to look around to see what else could be adjusted for better sailing and security. Good luck and have fun.  

How old is the main sail? I had that problem when we purchased our 2002 boat in 2018. We replaced the main in 2019, and it works like a charm.  

• This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Accept Learn more…

Advertisement

Rainstorms impacts on water, sediment, and trace elements loads in an urbanized catchment within Moscow city: case study of summer 2020 and 2021

• Published: 07 December 2022
• Volume 151 , pages 871–889, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

• Sergey Chalov   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6937-7020 1 , 2 ,
• Vladimir Platonov 1 ,
• Oxana Erina 1 ,
• Vsevolod Moreido 1 , 3 ,
• Mikhail Samokhin 1 ,
• Dmitriy Sokolov 1 ,
• Maria Tereshina 1 ,
• Yulia Yarinich 1 &
• Nikolay Kasimov 1  

323 Accesses

7 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

In 2020 and 2021, the city of Moscow, Russia, has experienced two historical rainfall events that had caused major flooding of small rivers. Based on long-term observation datasets from the surrounding weather stations, regional mesoscale COSMO-CLM climate model results, and a detailed hydrological and water quality monitoring data, we performed a pioneer assessment of climate change and urbanization impact on flooding hazard and water quality of the urban Setun River as a case study. Statistically significant rise of some moderate ETCCDI climate change indices (R20mm and R95pTOT) was revealed for the 1966–2020 period, while no significant trends were observed for more extreme indices. The combined impact of climate change and increased urbanization is highly non-linear and results in as much as a fourfold increase in frequency of extreme floods and shift of water regime features which lead to formation of specific seasonal flow patterns. The rainstorm flood wave response time, involving infiltrated and hillslope-routed fraction of rainfall, is accounted as 6 to 11 h, which is more than twice as rapid as compared to the non-urbanized nearby catchments. Based on temporal trends before and after rainfall flood peak, four groups of dissolved chemicals were identified: soluble elements whose concentrations decrease with an increase in water discharge; mostly insoluble and well-sorted elements whose concentrations increase with discharge (Mn, Cs, Cd, Al); elements negatively related to water discharge during flood events (Li, B, Cr, As, Br and Sr); and a wide range of dissolved elements (Cu, Zn, Mo, Sn, Pb, Ba, La, Cs, U) which concentrations remain stable during rainfall floods. Our study identifies that lack of research focused on the combined impacts of climate change and urbanization on flooding and water quality in the Moscow urban area is a key problem in water management advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Ahammed F (2017) A review of water-sensitive urban design technologies and practices for sustainable stormwater management. Sustain Water Resour Manag 33(3):269–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40899-017-0093-8

Article   Google Scholar  

Alekseeva AA, Bukharov VM, Losev VM (2022) The convective storm in the Moscow Region on June 28, 2021. Hydrometeorol Res Forecast 1:22–42. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.37162/2618-9631-2022-1-22-42

Aleshina MA, Semenov VA, Chernokulsky AV (2021) A link between surface air temperature and extreme precipitation over Russia from station and reanalysis data. Environ Res Lett 16:105004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1cba

Arakawa A, Lamb VR (1977) Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. In: Chang J (ed) Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, Vol 17: General Circulation Models of the Atmosphere. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 173–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4

Ashley RM, Balmfort DJ, Saul AJ, Blanskby JD (2005) Flooding in the future - Predicting climate change, risks and responses in urban areas. Water Sci Technol 52(5):265–273. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0142

Barbosa AE, Fernandes JN, David LM (2012) Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Res 46:6787–6798. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2012.05.029

Bedan ES, Clausen JC (2009) Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from traditional and low impact development watersheds. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45:998–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1752-1688.2009.00342.X

Bohman A, Glaas E, Karlson M (2020) Integrating Sustainable Stormwater Management in Urban Planning: Ways Forward towards Institutional Change and Collaborative Action. Water 12:203. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12010203

Brown RR, Keath N, Wong THF (2009) Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water Sci Technol 59:847–855. https://doi.org/10.2166/WST.2009.029

Cettner A, Ashley R, Viklander M, Nilsson K (2013) Stormwater management and urban planning: Lessons from 40 years of innovation. J Environ Plan Manag 56:786–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.706216

Chernokulsky A, Kozlov F, Zolina O et al (2019) Observed changes in convective and stratiform precipitation in Northern Eurasia over the last five decades. Environ Res Lett 14:045001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/AAFB82

Chubarova N, Smirnov A, Holben B (2011) Aerosol properties in Moscow according to 10 years of AERONET measurements at the meteorological observatory of Moscow State University. Geogr Environ Sustain 4(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2011-4-1-19-32

Contractor S, Donat MG, Alexander LV (2021) Changes in observed daily precipitation over global land areas since 1950. J Clim 34:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0965.1

Damodaram C, Giacomoni MH, Prakash Khedun C et al (2010) Simulation of combined best management practices and low impact development for sustainable stormwater management1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:907–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1752-1688.2010.00462.X

Darnthamrongkul W, Mozingo LA (2021) Toward sustainable stormwater management: Understanding public appreciation and recognition of urban Low Impact Development (LID) in the San Francisco Bay Area. J Environ Manage 300:113716. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.113716

Donat MG, Lowry AL, Alexander LV et al (2016) More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat Clim Chang 6:508–513. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2941

Erina O, Tereshina M, Shinkareva G et al (2021) Natural background and transformation of water quality in the Moskva River. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 834:12055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/834/1/012055

Erina O, Sokolov D, Tereshina M et al (2020) Seasonal dynamics of nutrients and organic matter in urban stream. E3S Web Conf 163:03004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016303004

Faccini F, Luino F, Sacchini A et al (2015) Geohydrological hazards and urban development in the Mediterranean area: An example from Genoa (Liguria, Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:2631–2652. https://doi.org/10.5194/NHESS-15-2631-2015

Gal-Chen T, Somerville RCJ (1975) On the use of a coordinate transformation for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. J Comput Phys 17:209–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(75)90037-6

Gasperi J, Zgheib S, Cladière M et al (2012) Priority pollutants in urban stormwater: part 2 – case of combined sewers. Water Res 46:6693–6703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WATRES.2011.09.041

Goulden S, Portman ME, Carmon N, Alon-Mozes T (2018) From conventional drainage to sustainable stormwater management: Beyond the technical challenges. J Environ Manage 219:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.04.066

Groisman PY, Knight RW, Easterling DR et al (2005) Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record. J Clim 18:1326–1350. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3339.1

Hale RL (2016) Spatial and temporal variation in local stormwater infrastructure use and stormwater management paradigms over the 20th century. Water 8:310. https://doi.org/10.3390/W8070310

Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P et al (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 146:1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803

Herzog HJ, Vogel G, Schubert U (2002) LLM – a nonhydrostatic model applied to high-resolving simulations of turbulent fluxes over heterogeneous terrain. Theor Appl Climatol 731(73):67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00704-002-0694-4

Karl TR, Nicholls N, Ghazi A (1999) CLIVAR/GCOS/WMO Workshop on Indices and Indicators for Climate Extremes Workshop Summary. Weather and Climate Extremes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–7

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Klimanova OA, Illarionova OI (2020) Green infrastructure indicators for urban planning: applying the integrated approach for Russian largest cities. Geogr Environ Sustain 13:251–259. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-123

Kosheleva NE, Vlasov DV, Timofeev IV et al (2022) Benzo[a]pyrene in Moscow road dust: pollution levels and health risks. Environ Geochem Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-022-01287-9

Lappalainen HK, Altimir N, Kerminen V-M et al (2018) Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX) Program: an overview of the first 5 years in operation and future prospects. Geogr Environ Sustain 11:6–19. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2018-11-1-6-19

Lappalainen HK, Petäjä T, Vihma T et al (2022) Overview: Recent advances in the understanding of the northern Eurasian environments and of the urban air quality in China – a Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX) programme perspective. Atmos Chem Phys 22:4413–4469. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4413-2022

Lee JH, Bang KW (2000) Characterization of urban stormwater runoff. Water Res 34:1773–1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00325-5

Liang P, Ding Y (2017) The long-term variation of extreme heavy precipitation and its link to urbanization effects in Shanghai during 1916–2014. Adv Atmos Sci 34:321–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6120-0

Lu J, Liu J, Fu X, Wang J (2021) Stormwater hydrographs simulated for different structures of urban drainage network: dendritic and looped sewer networks. Urban Water J 18:522–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2021.1893369

Maragno D, Gaglio M, Robbi M et al (2018) Fine-scale analysis of urban flooding reduction from green infrastructure: An ecosystem services approach for the management of water flows. Ecol Modell 386:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.08.002

Masson V, Lemonsu A, Hidalgo J, Voogt J (2020) Urban climates and climate change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 45:411–444

McPhillips LE, Matsler M, Rosenzweig BR, Kim Y (2021) What is the role of green stormwater infrastructure in managing extreme precipitation events? Sustain Resilient Infrastruct 6:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2020.1754625

Miller JD, Hutchins M (2017) The impacts of urbanisation and climate change on urban flooding and urban water quality: A review of the evidence concerning the United Kingdom. J Hydrol Reg Stud 12:345–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.06.006

Mokhov II, Roekner E, Semenov VA, Khon VC (2005) Extreme precipitation regimes in Northern Eurasia in the 20th century and their possible changes in the 21st century. Dokl Earth Sci 403:767–770

Google Scholar  

Nikiforova EM, Kasimov NS, Kosheleva NE, Timofeev IV (2022) Main features and contamination of sealed soils in the east of Moscow city. Environ Geochem Health 44:1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-021-01132-5

Popovicheva O, Chichaeva M, Kovach R et al (2022) Seasonal, weekly, and diurnal black carbon in moscow megacity background under impact of urban and regional sources. Atmos 13(4):563. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040563

Praskievicz S, Chang H (2009) A review of hydrological modelling of basin-scale climate change and urban development impacts. Prog Phys Geogr 33:650–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309348098

Prudencio L, Null SE (2018) Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review. Environ Res Lett 13:033002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/AAA81A

Qiao XJ, Liu L, Kristoffersson A, Randrup TB (2019) Governance factors of sustainable stormwater management: A study of case cities in China and Sweden. J Environ Manag 248:109249. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2019.07.020

Qiao XJ, Liao KH, Randrup TB (2020) Sustainable stormwater management: a qualitative case study of the Sponge Cities initiative in China. Sustain Cities Soc 53:101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2019.101963

Ritter B, Geleyn J-F (1992) A comprehensive radiation scheme for numerical weather prediction models with potential applications in climate simulations. Mon Weather Rev 120:303–325. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120%3c0303:ACRSFN%3e2.0.CO;2

Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The Regional Climate Model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Zeitschrift 17:347–348. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309

Rosenberger L, Leandro J, Pauleit S, Erlwein S (2021) Sustainable stormwater management under the impact of climate change and urban densification. J Hydrol 596:126137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2021.126137

Schär C, Leuenberger D, Fuhrer O et al (2002) A new terrain-following vertical coordinate formulation for atmospheric prediction models. Mon Weather Rev 130:2459–2480. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130%3c2459:ANTFVC%3e2.0.CO;2

Schubert-Frisius M, Feser F, von Storch H, Rast S (2017) Optimal spectral nudging for global dynamic downscaling. Mon Weather Rev 145:909–927. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0036.1

Schulz JP, Vogel G (2020) Improving the processes in the land surface scheme TERRA: Bare soil evaporation and skin temperature. Atmosphere (basel) 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050513

Semenov V, Bengtsson L (2002) Secular trends in daily precipitation characteristics: greenhouse gas simulation with a coupled AOGCM. Clim Dyn 19:123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00382-001-0218-4

Sokolov D, Chalov S, Tereshina M et al (2021) Hydrological regime of the urban Setun River. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 834:12024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/834/1/012024

Sokolov D, Erina O, Tereshina M, Chalov S (2020) Human impact on organic matter distribution in the Moskva River. E3S Web Conf 163:05013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016305013

Tereshina M, Erina O, Sokolov D et al (2021) Longitudinal patterns of different pollutant concentrations in the Setun River. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 834:12051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/834/1/012051

Tereshina M, Erina O, Sokolov D et al (2020) Nutrient dynamics along the Moskva River under heavy pollution and limited self-purification capacity. E3S Web Conf 163:05014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016305014

Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117:1779–1800. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117%3c1779:ACMFSF%3e2.0.CO;2

Trenberth KE (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim Res 47:123–138. https://doi.org/10.3354/CR00953

Varentsov M, Wouters H, Platonov V, Konstantinov P (2018) Megacity-induced mesoclimatic effects in the lower atmosphere: a modeling study for multiple summers over Moscow. Russia Atmosphere (basel) 9:50. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9020050

Varentsov M, Samsonov T, Demuzere M (2020) Impact of urban canopy parameters on a megacity’s modelled thermal environment. Atmosphere (basel) 11:1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11121349

Vlasov D, Eremina I, Shinkareva G et al (2021) Daily variations in wet deposition and washout rates of potentially toxic elements in Moscow during spring season. Geogr Environ Sustain 14:219–233. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2020-162

Vlasov D, Kasimov N, Eremina I et al (2021) Partitioning and solubilities of metals and metalloids in spring rains in Moscow megacity. Atmos Pollut Res 12:255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.09.012

Vlasov D, Kosheleva N, Kasimov N (2021) Spatial distribution and sources of potentially toxic elements in road dust and its PM10 fraction of Moscow megacity. Sci Total Environ 761:143267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143267

Vlasov D, Vasil’chuk J, Kosheleva N, Kasimov N (2020) Dissolved and suspended forms of metals and metalloids in snow cover of megacity: partitioning and deposition rates in western Moscow. Atmos. 11

Voevodin VV, Antonov AS, Nikitenko DA et al (2019) Supercomputer Lomonosov-2: large scale, deep monitoring and fine analytics for the user community. Supercomput Front Innov 6:4–11. https://doi.org/10.14529/JSFI190201

Vorobevskii I, Al JF, Schneebeck F et al (2020) Urban floods: linking the overloading of a storm water sewer system to precipitation parameters. Hydrology 7:35. https://doi.org/10.3390/HYDROLOGY7020035

Walling DE, Collins AL, Stroud RW (2008) Tracing suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus sources in catchments. J Hydrol 350:274–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.047

Wouters H, Demuzere M, Blahak U et al (2016) The efficient urban canopy dependency parametrization (SURY) v1.0 for atmospheric modelling: Description and application with the COSMO-CLM model for a Belgian summer. Geosci Model Dev 9:3027–3054. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3027-2016

Wouters H, Demuzere M, Ridder K De, van Lipzig NPM (2015) The impact of impervious water-storage parametrization on urban climate modelling. Urban Clim 11:24–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.11.005

Yang L, Smith JA, Wright DB et al (2013) Urbanization and Climate Change: An Examination of Nonstationarities in Urban Flooding. J Hydrometeorol 14:1791–1809. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-095.1

Ye H, Fetzer EJ, Wong S, Lambrigtson BH (2017) Rapid decadal convective precipitation increase over Eurasia during the last three decades of the 20th century. Sci Adv 3:e1600944. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600944

Zhou X, Bai Z, Yang Y (2017) Linking trends in urban extreme rainfall to urban flooding in China. Int J Climatol 37:4586–4593. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5107

Zolina OG, Bulygina ON (2016) Current climatic variability of extreme precipitation in Russia. Fundam Appl Climatol 1:84–103. https://doi.org/10.21513/2410-8758-2016-1-84-103

Download references

Field studies were supported by Russian Science Foundation project 19–77-30004. The analytical experiments were done under Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation project 075–15-2021–574. COSMO-CLM model setup is a part of RFBR project 21–55-53039. The methodology of this study is developed under the Interdisciplinary Scientific and Educational School of Lomonosov Moscow State University «Future Planet and Global Environmental Change» and Kazan Federal University Strategic Academic Leadership Program (“PRIORITY-2030”). The research is carried out using the equipment of the shared research facilities of HPC computing resources at Lomonosov Moscow State University. Streamflow patterns analysis was carried out under Governmental Order to Water Problems Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, subject no. FMWZ-2022–0003, project 3.7.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991 GSP-1, Moscow, Russia

Sergey Chalov, Vladimir Platonov, Oxana Erina, Vsevolod Moreido, Mikhail Samokhin, Dmitriy Sokolov, Maria Tereshina, Yulia Yarinich & Nikolay Kasimov

Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya St., 18, 420008, Kazan, Russia

Sergey Chalov

Institute of Water Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Gubkina Str., 3, 119333, Moscow, Russia

Vsevolod Moreido

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, original draft preparation—Sergey Chalov; numerical experiments conducting and evaluation, precipitation data analysis, writing—Vladimir Platonov; the rainfall-runoff patterns analysis—Vsevolod Moreido; methodology, validation, writing—Oxana Erina, Dmitriy Sokolov, Maria Tereshina, Mikhail Samokhin; precipitation data preparation and visualization—Yulia Yarinich; review, editing—Nikolay Kasimov. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergey Chalov .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval, consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

Additional information, publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 714 KB)

Supplementary file2 (pdf 824 kb), supplementary file3 (pdf 112 kb), supplementary file4 (pdf 488 kb), supplementary file5 (pdf 668 kb), rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Chalov, S., Platonov, V., Erina, O. et al. Rainstorms impacts on water, sediment, and trace elements loads in an urbanized catchment within Moscow city: case study of summer 2020 and 2021. Theor Appl Climatol 151 , 871–889 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04298-9

Download citation

Received : 31 August 2022

Accepted : 23 November 2022

Published : 07 December 2022

Issue Date : January 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04298-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research